In class we
have talked about all kinds of issues from environmental situations to
technology wars. When thinking about how many countries cannot keep up with
technology because of cost, it made me think about how many of those countries
are also in poverty. Not only did it make me think of just the third
world countries, it even make me think about all of the Americans in “my own
back yard” who are living in poverty right now.
In
2010, more than 46.2 million Americans lived in poverty (ABC News). With that number cited there, you
might be asking yourself what is exactly does living in poverty mean? According
to Yahoo News, The Census Bureau in 2011, defined poverty as
"any individual living on an income of less than $11,139, or any family
of four living on less than $22,314. But that measure, developed over 40 years
ago, is inexact at best. It doesn't include non-cash benefits-things such as
food and housing subsidies—that can play a key role in supporting
families. Nor does the Census definition take into account the large
differences in the cost of living in different part of the country, or expenses
such as child-care" (Yahoo News). The U.S is not the only
country being affected by poverty rates, everyone around the world is.
Poverty in the U.S. does not look as bad when compared to third world
countries, like those on the African continent. The U.S. has many safety nets
for those in poverty. The U.S. tries and hides the facts to everyone around the
world including those in the United States that many U.S. citizens do live in
poverty. I believe that we try to hide it because we are trying to live up to
the expectations of the U.S. being a strong country, and we do not want to show
weakness. Although the U.S. tries to hide it, the government also has many
different ways of helping families out that are in need. For example, the U.S.
sets up subsidized housing, welfare programs such as food stamps, Medicaid, and
WICS for single mothers and infants.
The
children of America are very important to the government, and it also provides
multiple ways to make sure that every child that attends school does not go
hungry while learning. The government does not want to punish the children for
their parent’s economic status, so students whose
parents do not make a large
income can receive free breakfast and lunches. This program (The National
School Lunch Program) helps many children in public, nonprofit
private schooling and residential child care across the nation. This
program keeps some kids from starving. A number of children only get those two
meals a day from school because their family cannot afford to buy food.
One
question you might be asking yourself, is race an issue in the total number in
poverty? I did find the percentages of people on welfare by race, as of 2012.
The list included Blacks first at 39.8%, then Whites at 38.8%, then Hispanic at
15.7%, other ethic groups at 3.3%, and Asian at 2.4% (Statistic Brain).
Living in poverty can also be a mental state. It is up to the families as to
how they are going to live, and not every family is up to working hard and
getting off welfare. Welfare to some is just an entitlement replacing
achievement. A major factor that I think that helps explain most poverty in the United
States is that lack personal motivation. For example, some kids who live with
their families have too much family support when it comes to money, so
when they have to go out in the real world, they end up failing. Other things
to consider are the dropout rates, the availability of care programs that we
have to offer, and the economic class system. It all goes back to lack of
motivation, without motivation to do anything, you just get stuck in poverty
and rely on the government for a handout. Poverty in the United States will
never be eradicated but “stuck in poverty” has more to do with mental state
than monetary state.
I think since the poverty levels will changed based off of nation average income, poverty will never be erased. I can tell you I grew up in washington state and there many Caucasian people lived in poverty whereas, in Texas (the area I moved to), poverty seems to be more hispanic related. What I am trying to say is that I dont think it seems to be race related. I happen to agree that everyone has the opportunity to work hard and get out of poverty. My family is the prime example of that. We went from not being able to afford shoes, to creating a company. All through hard work. So I agree with you.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Stefaney, I also don't think poverty is race related. However I don't agree that everyone has opportunities to get out of poverty. It's a very slippery slope, and once you've falled down the slope of poverty it is VERY difficult to get back up. Although you think you can just work hard, many factors come into play when you talk about someone getting out of pvoerty. They might not be able to find a job, I mean we're having trouble finding a job and we have college degrees, think about someone who's living in a poverty stricken area and doesn't have a lot of education. I think the US realizes we have a big number of people in poverty (the numbers alone aren't usually correct because even people that have income above the 'proverty line' can still be in poverty), but it's easier to say we'll help them, then actually help them. We don't want to be a crutch for them by giving them free stuff but we can't just tell them to "work hard" and get out of it. It's a very difficult problem, and I'm glad you wrote about it.
ReplyDeleteMadeleine Talarico